Comments on: 48 Year Old Alex Castro Gets 25 Years In Prison For Killing A Dog! Can Somebody Get This Man A New Lawyer?

By: GreenDaisyMay

GreenDaisyMay — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:34:34 +0000

correction YOU are educated

By: GreenDaisyMay

GreenDaisyMay — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 19:33:58 +0000

Tim just want to Thank You for being able to see past the BS. Clearly you are a educated and didn’t convict on circumstantial evidence. The proof was there to be found. You Rock!!!

By: tim

tim — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 06:56:54 +0000

i was on the jury of that 2nd trial in regards to the letter. It was very clearly not written by him. I was the juror responsible for convincing all the other dumb ass jurors that he was innocent. We unanimously agreed he did not write it, but they were convinced that he has someone write it for him (and it was not threatening whatsoever but an address to the ethic and rules of motor cycle clubs) and figured they should convict him because that was basically like being guilty. That charge would have also got him 35 to life, luckily someone under the age of 50 and not a conservative piece of shit was on that jury (me and a 30 yr old mexican guy)

By: Ms. Very Stupid

Ms. Very Stupid — Wed, 30 Nov 2011 15:26:58 +0000

@Ray he WAS on his third strike - HOWEVER, the crimes he was convicted of were light-weight. The third strike law is locking people up for life for very minor crimes. I’m not saying that hurting a dog is not important, but I do NOT believe that someone should spend be imprisoned for 25 years for that. Look at his criminal history. His prior cases were years old and minor. 25 years is unreasonable in this situation. The punishment does not fit the crimes.

By: Ray XXXX

Ray XXXX — Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:44:27 +0000

The time fits. He was on his third strike. He is obviously a phsycopath with a violent past. “he only killed a dumb dog” Well left on the streets what is the next violent crime “A dumb child” This guy needs to be taken off the streets and rot in jail.

By: GreenDaisyMay

GreenDaisyMay — Tue, 03 May 2011 02:21:56 +0000

IT doesn’t stop there.
He was convicted using evidence that he was found Innocent of in a second trial. After his second trial, why is he still in prison? This case clearly shows what public defenders don’t do. Daniel Camp was totally incompetent in his misrepresentation of Castro. You get what you pay for and a public defender is free. Camp clearly had his own agenda. Castro’s jury were all white America, one construction worker, which was removed during deliberation. Oh yeah, how about the article was released the morning of his conviction. Six jurors were asked if they read it and only one said yes. Can you say mistrial!!! Talk about a corrupt system.

By: PinkScootie

PinkScootie — Thu, 16 Dec 2010 07:01:10 +0000

I think the penalty for killing a human being is only 20 years!@